ArticlePloS one2025
Lightweight deep models based on domain adaptation and network pruning for breast cancer HER2 scoring: IHC vs. H&E histopathological images.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in breast and gynecologic oncology: from molecular prediction to multimodal integration.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer is an aggressive cancer type that requires special diagnosis and treatment methods. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining effectively highlights relevant morphological structures within histopathological images yet can be expensive in terms of both labor and required laboratory equipment. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images are more readily available and less expensive than IHC images as they are routinely performed for all patient samples. Lightweight models are well-suited for deployment on resource-constrained devices such as mobile phones and embedded systems, making them ideal for real-time diagnosis in rural regions and developing countries. In this study, IHC images are compared to H&E images for automatic HER2 scoring using lightweight deep models that incorporate several advanced techniques including network pruning, domain adaptation, and attention mechanisms. Two lightweight models are presented: PrunEff4 and ATHER2. PrunEff4 is a subset of EfficientNetV2B0 pruned to reduce the network parameters by ~80%. ATHER2 is a customized lightweight network that employs different sized convolutional filters along with a convolutional block attention module (CBAM). For PrunEff4 and ATHER2, transfer learning (pretraining on ImageNet) and domain-specific pretraining were employed, respectively. Different datasets were utilized in the development and final testing phases in order to effectively evaluate their generalization capability. In all experiments, both networks resulted in accuracies ranging from 97% to 100% for binary classifications and from 95.5% to 98.5% for multiclass classifications regardless of whether IHC or H&E images were utilized. Network pruning significantly reduced the network parameters whilst maintaining reliable performance. Domain-specific pretraining significantly enhanced performance, particularly in complex classification tasks such as HER2 scoring using H&E images and multiclass classifications. Both IHC and H&E stained images were suitable for deep learning-based HER2 scoring, given that the deep networks are efficiently trained for the specified task.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.