ArticlePloS one2025
Enhancing security in instant messaging systems with a hybrid SM2, SM3, and SM4 encryption framework.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid integration of instant messaging systems (IMS) into critical domains such as finance, public services, and enterprise operations, ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of communication data has become a pressing concern. Existing IMS security solutions commonly employ traditional public-key cryptography, centralized authentication servers, or single-layer encryption, each of which is susceptible to single-point failures and provides only limited resistance against sophisticated attacks. This study addresses the research gap regarding the complementary advantages of SM2, SM3, and SM4 algorithms, as well as hybrid collaborative security schemes in IMS security. This paper presents a hybrid encryption security framework that combines the SM2, SM3, and SM4 algorithms to address emerging threats in IMS. The proposed framework adopts a decentralized architecture with certificateless authentication and performs all encryption and decryption operations on the client side, eliminating reliance on centralized servers and mitigating single-point failure risks. It further enforces an encrypt-before-store policy to enhance data security at the storage layer. The framework integrates SM2 for key exchange and authentication, SM4 for message encryption, and SM3 for integrity verification, forming a multi-layer defense mechanism capable of countering Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks, credential theft, database intrusions, and other vulnerabilities. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the system's strong security performance and communication efficiency: SM2 achieves up to 642 times faster key generation and 2.2 times faster decryption compared to RSA-3072; SM3 improves hashing performance by up to 11.5% over SHA-256; and SM4 delivers up to 22% higher encryption efficiency than AES-256 for small data blocks. These results verify the proposed framework's practicality and performance advantages in lightweight, real-time IMS applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.