Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40953025›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Automated detection and prediction of suicidal behavior from clinical notes using deep learning.

Brian E Bunnell, Athanasios Tsalatsanis, Chaitanya Chaphalkar, Sara Robinson, Sierra Klein, Sarah Cool, Elizabeth Szwast, Paul M Heider, Bethany J Wolf, Jihad S Obeid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brian E BunnellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Athanasios TsalatsanisResearch Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-8283
Chaitanya ChaphalkarResearch Methodology and Biostatistics Core, Office of Research, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5166-7606
Sara RobinsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Sierra KleinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Sarah CoolDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, United States of America.
Elizabeth SzwastBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Paul M HeiderBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Bethany J WolfBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Jihad S ObeidBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-7779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep learning approaches have tremendous potential to improve the predictive power of traditional suicide prediction models to detect and predict intentional self-harm (ISH). Existing research is limited by a general lack of consistent performance and replicability across sites. We aimed to validate a deep learning approach used in previous research to detect and predict ISH using clinical note text and evaluate its generalizability to other academic medical centers.

methodsWe extracted clinical notes from electronic health records (EHRs) of 1,538 patients with International Classification of Diseases codes for ISH and 3,012 matched controls without ISH codes. We evaluated the performance of two traditional bag-of-words models (i.e., Naïve Bayes, Random Forest) and two convolutional neural network (CNN) models including randomly initialized (CNNr) and pre-trained Word2Vec initialized (CNNw) weights to detect ISH within 24 hours of and predict ISH from clinical notes 1-6 months before the first ISH event.

resultsIn detecting concurrent ISH, both CNN models outperformed bag-of-words models with AUCs of.99 and F1 scores of 0.94. In predicting future ISH, the CNN models outperformed Naïve Bayes models with AUCs of 0.81-0.82 and F1 scores of 0.61-.64.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that leveraging EHRs with a well-defined set of ISH ICD codes to train deep learning models to detect and predict ISH using clinical note text is feasible and replicable at more than one institution. Future work will examine this approach across multiple sites under less controlled settings using both structured and unstructured EHR data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicideAdultBayes TheoremElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID40953025
PMCPMC12435685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.