Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952924›Full record

ArticleGerontology2025

Impact of Informal Caregiving at Older Ages on Loneliness and Social Networks in Singapore.

Ting Yong, Abhijit Visaria, Rahul Malhotra

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ting YongDoctor of Medicine (MD) Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Abhijit VisariaCentre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Rahul MalhotraCentre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn ageing societies, older adults may increasingly take on informal caregiving responsibilities for others. Although some previous studies indicate that informal caregiving among adults is associated with an increased risk of loneliness and social isolation, studies have not focused specifically on informal caregivers who are older adults themselves and therefore may be at increased risk of adverse psychosocial outcomes. In this study, we aimed to assess if informal caregiving at older ages adversely impacts loneliness and social networks.

methodsWe used data pertaining to 2,577 participants in a nationally representative longitudinal study of community-dwelling older adults in Singapore, a rapidly ageing Asian country. To address selection bias into caregiving, we estimated the relationship between caregiving status with loneliness and social networks using inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment, controlling for multiple demographic and health characteristics.

resultsInformal caregiving among older adults impacted loneliness and was related to a 28.9% higher loneliness score. However, informal caregiving at older ages was not related to either social networks overall or family- and friends-focused social networks.

conclusionOlder adult informal caregivers are a vulnerable subgroup at a higher risk of loneliness. Although informal caregiving does not impact social networks, older adult informal caregivers experience higher loneliness, i.e., a perceived discrepancy between their actual and desired social relationships compared to non-caregivers. Our study suggests the need for further examination of the underlying mechanisms between informal caregiving at older ages and loneliness, as well as a special focus on older adult caregivers in efforts and interventions to address loneliness at older ages.

Indexed as

CaregiversLonelinessSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansIndependent LivingLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSingaporeSocial IsolationInformal caregivingInverse probability-weighted regression adjustmentLonelinessOlder adult caregiversSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID40952924
PMCPMC12622986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.