ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024
Adapting to emergent paradigm shifts: A calibration study among graduating dental students using the new classification of periodontal diseases.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 2018 Classification of Periodontitis: Challenges from Clinical Perspective.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Clinical validation of a web-based decision support system for periodontal diagnosis, risk assessment, and recall planning: A multicenter study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions introduced the 2018 Classification. Formulating periodontal diagnosis differs from clinician to clinician and depends on the expertise and competence of the clinician. We aimed to assess calibration levels of periodontal diagnosis based on the 2018 classification among senior-year dental interns at Batterjee Medical College in Saudi Arabia preparing for practice and subsequent graduation. Materials and Methods: In this preapproved study, 52 senior-year dental students received a two-hour presentation on the 2018 classification by a single teacher, followed by a preliminary exam. One week later, the students were subjected to 12 study cases demonstrating a variety of periodontal and Results: The total examination score was 12.69 ± 2.74 and 15.12 ± 2.99 (p = 0.001) for the pre- and post-tests, respectively. Furthermore, the difficulty factor and discrimination index increased by 12 % (p = 0.007) and 7 % (p = 0.244), respectively. Finally, the kappa statistic showed moderate agreement at 0.427 (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Inter-rater agreement with the gold standard increased after training, and this improvement was fairly successful in providing graduating dental students with diagnostic abilities simultaneously with the emergence of a new classification system. A calibration procedure based on a simple feedback approach provided beneficial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.