ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024
Enhancing predictive analytics in mandibular third molar extraction using artificial intelligence: A CBCT-Based study.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Surgical Problems and Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- AI in Dentistry: Innovations, Ethical Considerations, and Integration Barriers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automatic mandibular third molar and mandibular canal relationship determination based on deep learning models for preoperative risk reduction.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Forecasting the complexity of extracting mandibular third molars is crucial for selecting appropriate surgical methods and minimizing postoperative complications. This study aims to develop an AI-driven predictive model using CBCT reports, focusing specifically on predicting the difficulty of mandibular third molar extraction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 738 CBCT reports of mandibular third molars. The data was divided into a training set consisting of 556 reports and a validation set containing 182 reports. The study involved two main steps: pre-processing and processing of the textual data. During pre-processing, the reports were cleaned and standardized. In the processing phase, a rule-based NLP algorithm was employed to identify relevant features such as angulation, number of roots, root curvature, and root-nerve canal relationship. These features were utilized for the training of a deep learning neural network to classify the extraction difficulty into four categories: easy, slightly difficult, moderately difficult, and very difficult. Results: The classification model achieved an accuracy of 95% in both the training and validation sets. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics were calculated, yielding promising results with precision and recall values of 0.97 and 0.95 for the training set, and 0.97 and 0.89 for the validation set, respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the high reliability of AI-based models to forecast the complexity of the mandibular third molar extractions from CBCT reports. The results indicate that AI-driven models can accurately predict extraction difficulty, thereby aiding clinicians in making informed decisions and potentially improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.