Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952855›Full record

ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024

An exploratory assessment of GPT-4o and GPT-4 performance on the Japanese National Dental Examination.

Masaki Morishita, Hikaru Fukuda, Shino Yamaguchi, Kosuke Muraoka, Taiji Nakamura, Masanari Hayashi, Izumi Yoshioka, Kentaro Ono, Shuji Awano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Performance Comparison of a Domain-Specific Chatbot and General-Purpose Chatbots in Dental Traumatology.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masaki MorishitaDivision of Clinical Education Development and Research, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hikaru FukudaDivision of Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Physical Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Shino YamaguchiDivision of Clinical Education Development and Research, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kosuke MuraokaDivision of Clinical Education Development and Research, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Taiji NakamuraDivision of Periodontology, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Masanari HayashiVice President, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Izumi YoshiokaDivision of Oral Medicine, Department of Physical Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kentaro OnoDivision of Physiology, Department of Health Promotion, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Shuji AwanoDivision of Clinical Education Development and Research, Department of Oral Function, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Multiple large language models (LLMs) have been released since 2022, including OpenAI's GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. The latest model, GPT-4o, introduced on May 13, 2024, significantly improves GPT-4. Previous studies have shown the potential of LLMs as educational tools in medical and dental exams. This study evaluates the accuracy of GPT-4 and GPT-4o responses for the Japanese National Dental Examination (JNDE) to assess their potential as educational tools for dental education. Materials and methods: We obtained the dataset of the 117th JNDE, administered in January 2024, consisting of 360 questions. After excluding questions with images and inappropriate ones, 202 questions were selected. GPT-4 and GPT-4o were used to generate responses. Standardized prompts ensured consistent input. Data analysis used Qlik Sense® and GraphPad Prism, employing Fisher's exact test. Results: GPT-4o showed a significantly higher correct response rate (73.8%) than GPT-4 (63.3%). In the compulsory section, GPT-4o achieved 88.6% accuracy, significantly higher than GPT-4's 74.3%. Though not statistically significant, the general section saw an improvement with GPT-4o (66.4%) over GPT-4 (58.0%). Conclusion: GPT-4o significantly outperformed GPT-4 in accuracy for JNDE questions, suggesting its improved potential as an educational tool in dental education. Further studies are needed to evaluate GPT-4o's capabilities with visual materials and in diverse question sets to fully ascertain its utility in educational settings.

Indexed as

Education toolGPT-4GPT-4oJapanese National Dental Examination

Identifiers

PMID40952855
PMCPMC11976070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.