ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2024
A cross-sectional study on dentists' learning preferences for learning about light-curing units and resin-based composites.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary endodontic practices among endodontic specialists in Saudi Arabia: a comparative cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating Knowledge and Practice Related to Light-Curing and Resin-Based Composites Polymerization.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of clinicians' use of fast-curing and budget light-curing units in Saudi Arabia.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite researchers emphasizing the importance of understanding the type, how they should be used, and their effect on restoration longevity, many dentists lack critical knowledge about their light curing units (LCUs). Aim: To identify the parameters dentists use when choosing an LCU or resin-based composite (RBC) and to determine the most effective educational method for dentists to learn about LCUs. Methods: A cross-sectional study used a validated electronic questionnaire targeting dentists, interns, and students in private and government sectors. Demographic data, current LCU practices, parameters for selecting LCUs and RBCs, and the preferred educational methods for learning about LCUs were collected. The three main parameters used to determine participants' knowledge of LCU selection were brand reputation, irradiance, and LCU wavelength compatibility with the RBC photoinitiator spectrum. Results were analyzed using chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and independent sample Results: A total of 420 participants completed the survey. Only 11 % considered the wavelength as the 1st parameter when selecting an LCU. Participants with graduate degrees were significantly more knowledgeable about the LCU selection parameters than those with bachelor's degrees (p = 0.009). Dentists who frequently used LCUs knew significantly more about the RBC selection parameters (p = 0.037). Hands-on workshops, in-person lectures, and online lectures were preferred over social media. YouTube is one of the most popular social media platforms. All participants preferred YouTube as the top social media educational resource, with specialists and consultants showing a significantly stronger preference than general dentists, interns, and students (p = 0.036). Conclusion: Few participants thought that the need for the wavelengths emitted by the LCU to be compatible with the absorption spectrum of the photoinitiator used in the RBC was a key parameter when selecting an LCU or RBC. Respondents favored hands-on workshops and in-person lectures over social media to learn about LCUs. Educators should prioritize these methods to enhance understanding the choice and use of LCUs and RBCs within the dental community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.