ReviewAnnals of African medicine2026
A New Threat on the Rise: Oropouche Viral Infection.
Review in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe Oropouche virus (OROV), a member of the Simbu group's Orthobunyaviruses, is a vector-borne virus with three single-stranded negative-sense RNA segments and a spherical lipid sheath. It is mainly spread by Culicoides paraensis midges and, to a lesser extent, Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. OROV, first reported in Trinidad and Tobago in 1955, has since spread to Brazil, Colombia, and Peru, causing serological epidemics and recently invading nonendemic regions. The severity of the disease can vary from cold symptoms to severe illness, such as meningitis. Recent outbreaks in Acre and Brazil have emphasized severe fetal outcomes such as microcephaly and congenital anomalies as a result of vertical transmission of the virus. Deforestation, urbanization, and climate change contribute to the major spread of OROV by increasing vector populations and promoting the transfer of the virus. The diagnosis is difficult due to symptoms such as those of dengue and chikungunya. Laboratory diagnosis involves two techniques: serological and molecular; nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and other advanced methods include viral isolation and immunofluorescence. Vaccine development is still an active area of research; potential vaccine candidates include VSV-OROV and epitope-based receptor mimics. Recent travel-related cases in the US and Europe highlight the need for improved surveillance and prevention strategies, highlighting the importance of vector control and personal protective measures. This review sheds light on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic challenges, and assessment of OROV prevention and treatment programs, intending to guide public health intervention and research efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.