Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952768›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Evaluation of Phaseolus vulgaris lec- lpa as Alternative Protein Source on Growth Performances, Health Status, Faecal Minerals and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglet's Diet.

Benedetta Canala, Sara Frazzini, Matteo Dell'Anno, Matteo Santoru, Irene Ferri, Francesca Sparvoli, Lucrezia Luciani, Bianca Castiglioni, Paola Cremonesi, Filippo Biscarini and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. LiveFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benedetta CanalaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-7935
Sara FrazziniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-0003
Matteo Dell'AnnoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-864X
Matteo SantoruDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9582-8519
Irene FerriDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0678-0178
Francesca SparvoliInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3304-7548
Lucrezia LucianiInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7756-1722
Bianca CastiglioniInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-6701
Paola CremonesiInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8239-5549
Filippo BiscariniInstitute of Agricultural Biology and Biotechnology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3901-2354
Martina GhidoliDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-6557
Roberto PiluDepartment of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0181-2169
Luciana RossiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences - DIVAS, Università degli Studi di Milano, Lodi, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-4683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetically modified soybean is largely used in animal feed and its massive cultivation affects the environmental sustainability of livestock and the dependency for the import in the European market.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the partial substitution of soybean meal with an innovative common bean genotype (Phaseolus vulgaris lec-lpa) with reduced content of anti-nutritional factors on zootechnical performance, gut microbiota modulation and faecal minerals in post-weaning piglets.

methodsFourteen piglets were divided into a control group fed with a basal diet and a treatment group fed with a commercial diet in which 7.3% of soybean meal and 0.8% of soybean oil were replaced with 10% of P. vulgaris lec- lpa for 28 days. BW, ADG, ADFI and FCR were evaluated, and diarrhoea incidence was recorded. Evaluation of pH, nitrogen content, protein digestibility and mineral content was performed on faecal samples. Microbiota was analysed by rectal swabs samples. Blood serum metabolic profile was evaluated.

resultsThe treatment group showed lower BW and ADG during the trial (p < 0.05), but the health status of the animals was preserved. The treatment group released lower levels of minerals in faeces when compared with the control group after 28 days (p < 0.05) suggesting a lower dispersion of faecal minerals in the environment. Significant Beta diversity index was observed at 14 and 28 days (p < 0.05). Roseburia and Butyricicoccus increased in treatment group at day 28 (p < 0.05). These genera are associated with SCFA production, contributing to the maintenance of intestinal integrity, promoting positive bacterial populations and limiting inflammatory phenomena.

conclusionsIn conclusion, P. vulgaris lec- lpa could be a viable and sustainable alternative protein source to reduce the European protein gap, playing a potential role in microbiota modulation and faecal minerals release.

Indexed as

Animal FeedGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMineralsPhaseolusSus scrofaAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietFecesHealth StatusMaleSwineWeaningMineralsalternative protein sourcecommon beanfaecal mineralsmicrobiotaorganic farmingsoybean

Identifiers

PMID40952768
PMCPMC12435302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.