Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952653›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Determinants, Impact and Optimal Resource Allocation of Zambia's Scaling Up Nutrition Program.

Ann Levin, Sikota Sharper, Athena Pantazis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann LevinLevin and Morgan LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA. ann@levinmorgan.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-7648
Sikota SharperDepartment of Economics, Kwame Nkrumah University, Kabwe, Zambia.
Athena PantazisICF International, Arlington, VA, USA.

Funding

USAID 72061119C00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesZambia's Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN) Program is a multi-sectoral program with a package of nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive interventions to reduce stunting in children. The purpose of the study was to conduct an economic analysis of the SUN Most Critical Days Program (MCDP) II activities during 2018-2022.

methodsThe economic analysis evaluated SUN/MCDP II nutrition interventions through three analyses: (i) estimating their impact on mortality and morbidity since 2018 with the LiST tool, (ii) identifying the determinants of stunting with a Oaxaca Blinder counterfactual decomposition, and (iii) assessing the efficient resource allocation of SUN/MCDP II resources using the Optima Nutrition Tool.

resultsThe LiST modelling analysis estimated that since 2018, SUN/MCDP II interventions reduced deaths, diarrhoeal incidence, and stunting among children under 5 years of age in all 30 districts. Vitamin A supplementation was the largest contributor to reductions in deaths and diarrhoeal incidence, The Oaxaca Blinder counterfactual decomposition analysis found that the main contributors to stunting decline were access to piped water, maternal education, child birth weight, and basic sanitation in Zambia. The Optima Nutrition analysis revealed that stunting decline could be maximized if more funding is put into the interventions of Vitamin A and WASH interventions as well as adding some other interventions. CONCLUSION FOR PRACTICE: The SUN Program has led to a reduction in childhood stunting as well as mortality. The Program's package of interventions could be further enhanced through optimizing the allocation of resources.

Indexed as

Growth DisordersResource AllocationChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleNutritional StatusProgram EvaluationZambiaDeterminantsEconomic analysisNutritionResource allocation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.