ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2026
Presymptomatic Screening for Risks to Children's Mental Health : Ethical Considerations from a European Focus Group Study with Mental Health Professionals.
Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of presymptomatic screening for risks to children's mental health holds the promise to prevent or reduce the burden of mental disorders by enabling timely preventive actions. However, such screening programmes also raise ethical concerns related to false positive results, increased anxiety, harmful effects on a child's sense of self, and stigmatization. Stakeholders can provide valuable insights into these ethical concerns from their engagement with practice. Therefore, in this study we conducted six focus group discussions with professionals in the child mental health domain (in clinical, educational, or policy settings) to investigate their views on presymptomatic screening and identify ethical considerations. The discussions took place in six European countries. Three main themes were identified: 1) Promises and concerns about screening for risks to children's mental health, 2) Additional considerations about biomarker screening, and 3) Implications for healthcare systems and society. Ethical considerations included the benefits of screening outweighing the harms, informed and autonomous decision-making, the actionability of screening outcomes, stigmatization, and medicalization. Our findings underscore the importance of exercising caution in the development and implementation of presymptomatic screening for risks to children's mental health. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.