Observational studyMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Kinematic instrumental assessment quantifies compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients.
Observational study in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using MediaPipe to track upper-limb reaching movements after stroke: a proof-of-principle study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, the upper limb function of hemiplegic post-stroke patients is commonly evaluated using clinical tests and questionnaires. Performing a reliable investigation of compensatory strategies adopted for the upper limb movement may shed light on the basis of motor control and the mechanism of functional recovery. To quantitatively evaluate the compensatory strategies in post-stroke hemiplegic patients, we conducted an observational study in which 36 hemiplegic patients were enrolled and were stratified according to the Fugl-Meyer score. We assessed compensatory strategies in upper limb movements, specifically reaching (RCH) and hand-to-mouth (HTM) movements, using the Kinect V2 device. 11 severe, 8 severe-moderate, 9 moderate-mild, and 8 mild patients and 17 controls participated in the study. Our results showed that severe, severe-moderate, and moderate-mild patients can be discriminated from healthy participants in almost all parameters. In particular, patients showed a reduced ROM of the shoulder in RCH, higher shoulder and elbow vertical displacement, and lower wrist vertical displacement in HTM. Interestingly, compensatory parameters also discriminate mild patients from healthy controls, such as head frontal and vertical displacements. Our protocol works effectively and the instrumental assessment of compensatory strategies in post-stroke patients allows to discriminate different levels of impairments even with low-cost devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.