ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2025
Unveiling the Sex-Based Divide: Exploring Sex Differences in Peripheral Artery Disease.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- C-reactive protein and incidence of symptomatic peripheral vascular disease (sPVD): Findings from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA).American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Paclitaxel Efficacy in Dialysis-Dependent Peripheral Artery Disease: A National Cohort Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Concomitant Venous Disease in Patients with Advanced Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Patient- and Limb-Level Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewPeripheral artery disease (PAD) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite its growing clinical burden, the disease remains relatively understudied and underdiagnosed relative to other cardiovascular diseases, especially in female patients. While PAD prevalence is similar in males and females, sex-based disparities have been noted in the presentation, diagnosis rates, treatment methods, and clinical outcomes of PAD patients. This article serves to provide an overview of existing knowledge on sex-based differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management, and patient outcomes of PAD. RECENT
findingsFemale patients with PAD remain underdiagnosed and undertreated, with females receiving lower referral rates to supervised exercise therapy and guideline-directed medical therapy despite observing similar benefits from treatment as males. Surgical interventions also see conflicting outcomes in male and female patients, with females now seeing improved outcomes despite prior studies indicating worsened quality of life. Cardiovascular risk factors such as history of smoking, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes also place females at heightened risk of PAD compared to male patients. There are also physiological disparities observed that affect the presentation and diagnosis rates of PAD, with female patients seeing increased platelet reactivity and aggregation yet receiving later diagnoses at more severe stages due to postmenopausal effects. In addition, female patients remain underrecruited in clinical research studies for cardiovascular disease, highlighting a need for further research focused on female patients and sex disparities in PAD. This article identifies key disparities between male and female patients with PAD, with inequities noted in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, and treatment approaches and outcomes. Further research is warranted to better understand sex-based differences in PAD and better inform patient treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.