Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952548›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026

Fractal-driven self-supervised learning enhances early-stage lung cancer GTV segmentation: a novel transfer learning framework.

Ryota Tozuka, Noriyuki Kadoya, Arata Yasunaga, Masahide Saito, Takafumi Komiyama, Hikaru Nemoto, Hidetoshi Ando, Hiroshi Onishi, Keiichi Jingu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ryota TozukaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Noriyuki KadoyaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. noriyuki.kadoya.e4@tohoku.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5018-3800
Arata YasunagaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Masahide SaitoDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Takafumi KomiyamaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hikaru NemotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hidetoshi AndoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Keiichi JinguDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and evaluate a novel deep learning strategy for automated early-stage lung cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) segmentation, utilizing pre-training with mathematically generated non-natural fractal images. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 104 patients (36-91 years old; 81 males; 23 females) with peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy at our institution from December 2017 to March 2025. First, we utilized encoders from a Convolutional Neural Network and a Vision Transformer (ViT), pre-trained with four learning strategies: from scratch, ImageNet-1K (1,000 classes of natural images), FractalDB-1K (1,000 classes of fractal images), and FractalDB-10K (10,000 classes of fractal images), with the latter three utilizing publicly available models. Second, the models were fine-tuned using CT images and physician-created contour data. Model accuracy was then evaluated using the volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (vDSC), surface Dice Similarity Coefficient (sDSC), and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between the predicted and ground truth GTV contours, averaged across the fourfold cross-validation. Additionally, the segmentation accuracy was compared between simple and complex groups, categorized by the surface-to-volume ratio, to assess the impact of GTV shape complexity.

resultsPre-trained with FractalDB-10K yielded the best segmentation accuracy across all metrics. For the ViT model, the vDSC, sDSC, and HD95 results were 0.800 ± 0.079, 0.732 ± 0.152, and 2.04 ± 1.59 mm for FractalDB-10K; 0.779 ± 0.093, 0.688 ± 0.156, and 2.72 ± 3.12 mm for FractalDB-1K; 0.764 ± 0.102, 0.660 ± 0.156, and 3.03 ± 3.47 mm for ImageNet-1K, respectively. In conditions FractalDB-1K and ImageNet-1K, there was no significant difference in the simple group, whereas the complex group showed a significantly higher vDSC (0.743 ± 0.095 vs 0.714 ± 0.104, p = 0.006).

conclusionPre-training with fractal structures achieved comparable or superior accuracy to ImageNet pre-training for early-stage lung cancer GTV auto-segmentation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningFractalsLung NeoplasmsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAILungRadiotherapySegmentationTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40952548
PMCPMC12769625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.