ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Fractal-driven self-supervised learning enhances early-stage lung cancer GTV segmentation: a novel transfer learning framework.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of novel deep learning-based auto-segmentation software: Utility and potential pitfalls.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- CNN-RNN framework for lung cancer classification using CT imaging and GAN-based augmentation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate a novel deep learning strategy for automated early-stage lung cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) segmentation, utilizing pre-training with mathematically generated non-natural fractal images. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 104 patients (36-91 years old; 81 males; 23 females) with peripheral early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who underwent radiotherapy at our institution from December 2017 to March 2025. First, we utilized encoders from a Convolutional Neural Network and a Vision Transformer (ViT), pre-trained with four learning strategies: from scratch, ImageNet-1K (1,000 classes of natural images), FractalDB-1K (1,000 classes of fractal images), and FractalDB-10K (10,000 classes of fractal images), with the latter three utilizing publicly available models. Second, the models were fine-tuned using CT images and physician-created contour data. Model accuracy was then evaluated using the volumetric Dice Similarity Coefficient (vDSC), surface Dice Similarity Coefficient (sDSC), and 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between the predicted and ground truth GTV contours, averaged across the fourfold cross-validation. Additionally, the segmentation accuracy was compared between simple and complex groups, categorized by the surface-to-volume ratio, to assess the impact of GTV shape complexity.
resultsPre-trained with FractalDB-10K yielded the best segmentation accuracy across all metrics. For the ViT model, the vDSC, sDSC, and HD95 results were 0.800 ± 0.079, 0.732 ± 0.152, and 2.04 ± 1.59 mm for FractalDB-10K; 0.779 ± 0.093, 0.688 ± 0.156, and 2.72 ± 3.12 mm for FractalDB-1K; 0.764 ± 0.102, 0.660 ± 0.156, and 3.03 ± 3.47 mm for ImageNet-1K, respectively. In conditions FractalDB-1K and ImageNet-1K, there was no significant difference in the simple group, whereas the complex group showed a significantly higher vDSC (0.743 ± 0.095 vs 0.714 ± 0.104, p = 0.006).
conclusionPre-training with fractal structures achieved comparable or superior accuracy to ImageNet pre-training for early-stage lung cancer GTV auto-segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.