ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2025
Spatial variation and composition of bacterial communities in a cave system from Northern Mexico.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cave microbial communities are structured by environmental matrix and depth and can be characterized with field-portable assays.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Caves are oligotrophic, light-deprived ecosystems that host highly specialized and diverse microbial communities playing critical roles in biogeochemical cycling and ecological stability. In this study, we present the first comprehensive characterization of bacterial communities within the Nombre de Dios Caves in Chihuahua, northern Mexico. Using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing with PacBio HiFi technology, we analyzed bacterial diversity across five cave chambers. A total of 36 bacterial phyla, including 822 genera, were identified, with Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota, and Bacillota being the most dominant. At the genus level, JC017, Staphylococcus, Crocosphaera, and Enterobacter were among the most abundant taxa. Alpha diversity analyses revealed significant differences in Shannon diversity and evenness, suggesting that local chamber-specific factors may influence bacterial richness and community balance. Similarly, beta diversity analyses showed clear compositional differences between chambers, particularly in the palm tree and bathroom chambers, the latter being notably isolated from tourist access. This spatial variation highlights the influence of environmental heterogeneity and human presence on microbial community structure. The microbial assemblages included ecologically important genera such as Crocosphaera and Nodosilinea, known for nitrogen fixation, exopolysaccharide production, and biofilm development. Clinically relevant genera, including Escherichia, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus, were also detected, suggesting the possible introduction of allochthonous microbes through anthropogenic activity. These findings underscore the ecological and public health significance of cave microbiomes and offer valuable insights for microbial monitoring and conservation strategies in fragile karst environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40952532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.