ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
Synergy of advanced machine learning and deep neural networks with consensus molecular docking for virtual screening of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence inCancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses the urgent need for an AI model to predict Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer treatment, targeting the ALK-positive mutation. With only five Food and Drug Administration approved ALK inhibitors currently available, effective drugs remain in demand. Leveraging machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), our research accelerates the precise screening of novel ALK inhibitors using both ligand-based and structure-based approaches. In ligand-based approach, an ensemble voting model comprising three base learners to classify potential ALK inhibitors, achieving promising retrospective validation results. Notably, the ML-based XGBoost algorithm exhibited compelling results with external validation (EV)-f1 score of 0.921, EV-Average Precision (AP) of 0.961, cross-validation (CV)-f1 score of [Formula: see text] and CV-AP of [Formula: see text]. Besides, the DL-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model demonstrated comparative performance with EV-f1 score of 0.930, EV-AP of 0.955, CV-f1 score of [Formula: see text] and CV-AP of [Formula: see text]. For structure-based approach, an XGBoost consensus docking model utilized scores from three molecular docking programs (GNINA 1.0, Vina-GPU 2.0, and AutoDock-GPU) as features. Combining these two approaches, we virtually screened 120,571 compounds, identifying three promising ALK inhibitors, CHEMBL1689515, CHEMBL2380351, and CHEMBL102714, that bind to the protein's pocket and establish hydrophobic contacts in the hinge region through their ketone groups, resembling Alectinib's interaction. Comparative analysis revealed traditional ML models outperformed Graph Neural Networks (GNN), highlighting the critical role of feature engineering and dataset size importance. The study recommends further in vitro testing to validate the prospective screening performance of these models. A graphical user interface is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/thechuongtrinh/ALK_inhibitors_classification .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40952529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.