Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952529›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025

Synergy of advanced machine learning and deep neural networks with consensus molecular docking for virtual screening of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors.

The-Chuong Trinh, Tieu-Long Phan, Van-Thinh To, Thanh-An Pham, Gia-Bao Truong, Lai Hoang Son Le, Xuan-Truc Dinh Tran, Tuyen Ngoc Truong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

The-Chuong TrinhUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire Biosciences et Bioingénierie pour la Santé, UA13 INSERM-CEA-UGA, 3800, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8693-030X
Tieu-Long PhanBioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics and School for Embedded and Composite Artificial Intelligence (SECAI), Leipzig University, Härtelstraße 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3532-2064
Van-Thinh ToSchool of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang, Sai Gon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-7640-0807
Thanh-An PhamDepartment of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology (FCT NOVA), Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0271-2696
Gia-Bao TruongSchool of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang, Sai Gon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.ORCID 0009-0001-5379-1593
Lai Hoang Son LeDepartment of Chemistry, Texas A&M University, Chemistry Building, 580 Ross Street, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-6309
Xuan-Truc Dinh TranSchool of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang, Sai Gon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam.
Tuyen Ngoc TruongSchool of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 41 Dinh Tien Hoang, Sai Gon Ward, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam. truongtuyen@ump.edu.vn.ORCID 0000-0002-0952-1633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent need for an AI model to predict Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) inhibitors for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer treatment, targeting the ALK-positive mutation. With only five Food and Drug Administration approved ALK inhibitors currently available, effective drugs remain in demand. Leveraging machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), our research accelerates the precise screening of novel ALK inhibitors using both ligand-based and structure-based approaches. In ligand-based approach, an ensemble voting model comprising three base learners to classify potential ALK inhibitors, achieving promising retrospective validation results. Notably, the ML-based XGBoost algorithm exhibited compelling results with external validation (EV)-f1 score of 0.921, EV-Average Precision (AP) of 0.961, cross-validation (CV)-f1 score of [Formula: see text] and CV-AP of [Formula: see text]. Besides, the DL-based Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model demonstrated comparative performance with EV-f1 score of 0.930, EV-AP of 0.955, CV-f1 score of [Formula: see text] and CV-AP of [Formula: see text]. For structure-based approach, an XGBoost consensus docking model utilized scores from three molecular docking programs (GNINA 1.0, Vina-GPU 2.0, and AutoDock-GPU) as features. Combining these two approaches, we virtually screened 120,571 compounds, identifying three promising ALK inhibitors, CHEMBL1689515, CHEMBL2380351, and CHEMBL102714, that bind to the protein's pocket and establish hydrophobic contacts in the hinge region through their ketone groups, resembling Alectinib's interaction. Comparative analysis revealed traditional ML models outperformed Graph Neural Networks (GNN), highlighting the critical role of feature engineering and dataset size importance. The study recommends further in vitro testing to validate the prospective screening performance of these models. A graphical user interface is available at https://huggingface.co/spaces/thechuongtrinh/ALK_inhibitors_classification .

Indexed as

Anaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsDeep LearningMachine LearningMolecular Docking SimulationNeural Networks, ComputerProtein Kinase InhibitorsAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLigandsLung NeoplasmsALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnaplastic lymphoma kinaseArtificial intelligenceBenchmarkingComputer-aided drug designConsensus molecular dockingMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.