Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952443›Full record

ReviewThe patient2026

Using a Timeline Activity in Virtual Concept Elicitation Interviews with Youth: Methods and Lessons Learned from an Interpretive Descriptive Study to Develop a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (GENDER-Q Youth).

Shelby L Kennedy, Susan M Jack, Natasha Johnson, Jennifer Couturier, Charlene Rae, Anne F Klassen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The patient, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shelby L KennedyDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. deibersl@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7135-221X
Susan M JackDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Natasha JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Jennifer CouturierDepartment of Psychiatry, McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Charlene RaeDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Anne F KlassenDepartment of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Sex and Gender Science Chair GSL-171376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One-to-one interviews and focus groups are used to generate qualitative data about patients' health outcomes and inform the development of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). In the development of PROMs for young people, visual elicitation tools can be used with one-to-one interviews and focus groups to enhance the data generation process and data quality. This article aims to (1) provide a detailed description of how visual elicitation tools can be applied in the development of youth-specific PROMs using the GENDER-Q Youth study as an example and (2) share the lessons learned from the GENDER-Q Youth study with PROM developers who are considering using visual elicitation tools in their own virtual qualitative studies. This article discusses processes that took place within the context of a mixed-methods, multi-step study to develop a PROM for youth receiving gender-affirming care called GENDER-Q Youth. Step one was an applied qualitative health research study using an interpretive description approach. Virtual concept elicitation interviews were conducted with transgender and gender diverse youth aged 12-18 years at recruitment using an optional timeline-based visual elicitation tool (i.e., before interviews, youth were invited to create a timeline about their gender-affirming care journeys). The research team navigated ethical and logistical challenges associated with using timeline activities during the data generation process. These challenges occurred during the pre-interview stage (e.g., mailing activity supplies) and during interviews (e.g., incorporating the timeline activity into the interview). Details about the approach used by the research team, challenges faced, and lessons learned are discussed. When conducting one-to-one virtual concept elicitation interviews, visual elicitation tools have the potential to enhance the quality of data generated about participants' outcomes and experiences of healthcare. Visual elicitation tools can also improve the interview experiences of both participants and researchers and are feasible to implement within the context of qualitative PROM development research with young people.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTransgender PersonsAdolescentChildFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.