ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2025
Robotic Single-Port Versus Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Early Endometrial Cancer: A Case Control Study.
Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application and early experience of da Vinci Xi robotic single-site laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in mainland China: early experience from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 221 cases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Single+1 Port Robotic Splenectomy Using the da Vinci SP System-Experience of a Single Centre.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Evaluating the learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic total hysterectomy: single-port versus multi-port Da Vinci platforms.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Robotic Single-Port Versus Robotic Single-Site Hysterectomy in Early Endometrial Cancer: A Case Control Study.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare surgical outcomes of robotic single-port (RSPH) versus single-site (RSSH) hysterectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer.
methodsThis is a retrospective case-control study, comparing surgical outcomes of RSPH (Cases) and RSSH (Controls) in early-stage endometrial cancer.
resultsTwenty-five women who underwent RSPH from June 2024 to November 2024 were matched with 50 historical RSSH controls treated at the same institution by the same surgical team between December 2011 and September 2014. Operation time was similar: 110 min in RSPH and 99 min in RSSH (p = 0.76). Blood loss was 50 mL in RSPH and 60 mL in RSSH (p = 0.14). Hospital stay was shorter in RSSH (3.5 days in RSPH and 3 days in RSSH, p = 0.001).
conclusionsOur study confirms the safety and feasibility of RSPH for endometrial cancer without major differences from the RSSH in terms of surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.