Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952305›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2025

The Utilization of Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Thailand: A Comparison of Screening with and without Self-sampling Samples.

Jetdapan Suwantaroj, Patumrat Sripan, Kraiwuth Kallawicha, Jade Tso, Noppcha Singweratham, Pallop Siewchaisakul

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jetdapan SuwantarojKrabi Hospital, Ministry of Public Health, Krabi, , Thailand.
Patumrat SripanResearch Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8337-9524
Kraiwuth KallawichaCollege of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9252-372X
Jade TsoUniversity of California, Davis School of Medicine, Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Harvard Medical School, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7495-5883
Noppcha SingwerathamFaculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4925-8497
Pallop SiewchaisakulFaculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-1915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer (CC) screening shifted from Pap-smear to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing HPV with and without a self-sampling HPV-test in Thailand. Few studies have reported the initial outcomes of such a transition. This study aims to explore CC screening rate, CC detection and compare the CC detection rate by HPV with and without self-sampling methods in Krabi, province.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted from 1st October 2023 to 30th September 2024. A total of 11,925 women's records were retrieved. Information on demographic, screening results and cancer diagnosis was retrieved from the Krabi provincial hospital. Different proportions of CC detections and self-test collection based on demographic features were tested using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.  Result: CC screening rate was 42.4%: 10,619 (89%) of women had an HPV test and 1,306 (11%) had a Pap-smear test. The screening rate was 30.2% in 2023 and 52.1% in 2024. With regard to age, occupation, and health insurance schemes there was a significant difference in the proportion of those taking the self- collection test. Religion showed non-significance difference in the proportion of self-sampling test in relation to religion. CC detection was 3% among women who underwent the Pap-smear test and 0.12% for those who performed the HPV test. There is a significant difference in CC detection between the HPV with and without a self-sampling test.

conclusionCC screening with HPV testing, especially with self-sampling, showed a promising approach to increasing CC screening uptake in the population. The rate of CC detection through self-sampling was lower in the early years of implementation compared to non-self-sampling methods. Ensuring the correct performance of self-sampling should be carefully considered and monitored in the future.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSpecimen Handlingcervical cancer screeningHPVPap smearThailand

Identifiers

PMID40952305
PMCPMC12882021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.