ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
Real-world testing of the durability claims of a commercially available spray-on surface biocide.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of long-lasting antimicrobial surface sprays in real-life environment.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-disinfecting biocidal surfaces have been proposed as a solution to prevent infections caused by the transmission of microorganisms from frequently touched surfaces in hospitals and other settings. For example, surface anchoring quaternary ammonium salt (SAQAS)-based biocides are purported to maintain their antimicrobial potency for up to 30 days and are available as spray-on formulations. We tested the 30-day potency claim of a commercially available spray-on SAQAS-based biocide ("SAQAS-A") under "real-world" conditions in a microbiology laboratory where regular cleaning is routine. To do this, we determined the background microbial burden on high-traffic floor areas, routinely used bench areas, frequently touched handles, and glass surfaces for 30 days before and after applying SAQAS-A. Experiments were repeated three times, and data were analyzed using two generalized linear mixed models (GLMM). We observed that for >80% of bench samples, the number of viable bacteria recovered was below the highest acceptable level of 2.5 colony-forming units (CFU)/cm IMPORTANCE: We tested the claim that a commercially available spray-on biocide could protect surfaces from microbial contamination for 30 days. In the presence of routine disinfection, we found that spray-on applications of the surface anchoring quaternary ammonium salt-based biocide did not protect frequently touched surfaces in a working microbiology research lab for up to 30 days. Our data show that users of this type of product should be aware of the limitations of manufacturers' claims of "continued protection", and manufacturers should consider formulations that more reliably attach to surfaces. Similarly, regulatory and consumer protection agencies should provide clear guidance for companies wishing to make durability and longevity claims for biocidal surface applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.