Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952050›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical oncology2025

Logistic Model in Clinical and Health Research-the Elephant and Blind Men.

Ying Cao, Aaron J Katz, Xinglei Shen, Ryan T Morse, Christopher E Lominska, Ronald C Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ying CaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology.ORCID 0000-0001-9846-0176
Aaron J KatzPopulation Health, The University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS.
Xinglei ShenDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Ryan T MorseDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Christopher E LominskaDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Ronald C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Logistic models are everywhere in scientific research, including clinical and health research. However, there is no practical report on research results that will utilize many available statistical tools but mostly 1 or 2 only, for a logistic model. We introduce 6 powerful statistical tools, forest plot, AUC curve, nomogram, and decision curve analysis, as well as bootstrapping sampling and cross validation, by applying head and neck cancer data to a logistic model. We hope that these tools will make the logistic model, and accordingly our research, more comprehensive and clinically more applicable. In the 6 parts of the article, we introduce each of the 6 statistical tools (methods) with relevant figures and interpretations on key statistical concepts to show how we can improve our understanding on the logistic model and the clinical prospects behind the data. The statistical tools we present in the current special communication for reporting research or clinical trials in a logistic model, if popularized among researchers and clinicians, will make a research conclusion more comprehensive, valid and clinically applicable to other cases.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchArea Under CurveHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLogistic ModelsNomogramsdatalogistic modelstatistical tools

Identifiers

PMID40952050
PMCPMC12548809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.