Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40952024›Full record

ReviewChemSusChem2025

Sustainable Natural Product Glycosylation: A Critical Evaluation of Biocatalytic and Chemical Approaches.

Felipe Mejia-Otalvaro, Brianna Marie Lax, Onur Kırtel, Ditte Hededam Welner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Enzymatic 1,4-addition of 2-hydroxy-3-keto-glucal for β-selective aryl-Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Felipe Mejia-OtalvaroThe Novo Nordisk Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 22, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-1820
Brianna Marie LaxThe Novo Nordisk Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 22, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9727-7529
Onur KırtelThe Novo Nordisk Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 22, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-6810
Ditte Hededam WelnerThe Novo Nordisk Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, Søltofts Plads, Building 22, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9297-4133

Funding

Copenhagen Bioscience NNF22SA0078231Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF20CC0035580Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF23OC0085634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The glycosylation of natural products can significantly enhance their physicochemical properties, with numerous synthetic and biocatalytic methodologies continuously being developed, each presenting unique advantages and challenges. Biocatalytic methods are often presumed to be more sustainable alternatives to chemical approaches; however, their environmental and economic viabilities require critical evaluation. This review summarizes the recent advancements in natural product glycosylation and provides a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental assessment based on yield, titer, rate, environmental factor, and impact on endpoint categories using a life cycle impact assessment approach. Although biocatalytic methods are highlighted for their superior yields, they are frequently hindered by lower titers and reaction rates compared to their chemical counterparts. Surprisingly, chemical glycosylation exhibited lower environmental factors (E-factors), whereas biocatalytic approaches displayed lower impacts on endpoint categories, highlighting that E-factors fail to capture the environmental implications of a process. This review demonstrates the challenges associated with quantifying the environmental impacts of a process, especially given the lack of experimental detail reporting in the biocatalytic field. It exposes the misguided assumption that biocatalytic processes always exert lower environmental burdens and identifies key opportunities to enhance process efficiency and sustainability, providing guidance for selecting and developing a given natural product glycosylation reaction.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisBiological ProductsGreen Chemistry TechnologyGlycosylationBiological Productsbiocatalysischemical catalysisglycosylationnatural productssustainability

Identifiers

PMID40952024
PMCPMC12548952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.