Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Leslie S GaynorDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-4365
Francesca V LopezCenter of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare Systems, San Diego, California, USA.
Carol A Van HulleDivision of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Clara LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Sarinnapha M VasunilashornDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Brookline, Massachusetts, USA.
Shea J AndrewsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stephanie M SimoneDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dan M MungasDepartment of Neurology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California, USA.
Funding
National Alzheimer's Coordinating CenterU24AG072122 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI STEPHENS, KARI A · 2021 to 2025
$45.8M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062422 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Katherine P Rankin · 2019 to 2026
$36.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062421 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BRADFORD C DICKERSON · 2019 to 2026
$36.5M
UCSD Shiley-Marcos Alzheimer's Disease Research Center P30P30AG062429 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DOUGLAS R GALASKO · 2019 to 2026
$34.9M
Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Sanjay Asthana · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG062677 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KEJAL KANTARCI · 2019 to 2026
$33.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066514 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Margaret Sewell · 2020 to 2026
$31.0M
Yale Alzheimer Disease Research CenterP30AG066508 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN M STRITTMATTER · 2020 to 2026
$30.2M
Research Education CoreP30AG066462 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PHILIP L DE JAGER · 2020 to 2026
$30.1M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066468 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI C. Elizabeth Shaaban · 2020 to 2026
$29.4M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066507 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Corinne Pettigrew · 2020 to 2026
$29.3M
University of Washington Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066509 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Amanda D. Boyd · 2020 to 2026
introductionThe present study examined the dimensional structure of the neuropsychological test batteries from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Uniform Data Set (UDS) versions 2.0 and 3.0 and measurement equivalence across UDS versions and race/ethnicity groups.
methodsThere were 49,895 participants included in the present study. The best-fitting model was developed and tested in separate samples. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated measurement equivalence across UDS versions and race/ethnicity groups.
resultsResults identified a best-fitting four-factor model with residual structure. Multiple group CFA supported partial scalar invariance by UDS version and race/ethnicity group. Regarding race/ethnicity groups, the Language and Attention domains had more non-invariant intercepts, which most affected the White group. DISCUSSION: A four-factor model effectively summarizes the UDS neuropsychological test batteries across UDS versions and race/ethnicity groups. Crucial differences in measurement parameters must be accounted for in studies using these neuropsychological tests as outcomes. HIGHLIGHTS: A four-factor model summarizes cognition across Uniform Data Set (UDS) versions and race/ethnicity groups. Measurement invariance exists across race/ethnicity groups. Model fit differs between cognitively impaired and unimpaired samples. Accounting for differences in measurement parameters across groups is essential. Tailored normative data are crucial for certain UDS tests, including category fluency.
Indexed as
Alzheimer DiseaseNeuropsychological TestsAgedAged, 80 and overEthnicityFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalePsychometricscognitionmeasurement equivalencemultiple group confirmatory factor analysisNational Alzheimer's Coordinating Centerrace/ethnicityUniform Data Set
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Measurement equivalence of the UDS version 2.0 and 3.0 neuropsychological batteries. · full record | OpenQuestion