Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951906›Full record

ReviewEmergency medicine international2025

Postshock Pacing in Cardiac Arrest: A Concise Review.

Wojciech Telec, Salwan Al-Saad, Lukasz Karbowski, Tomasz Kłosiewicz, Artur Baszko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency medicine international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wojciech Telec2nd Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-8293
Salwan Al-SaadCardiology Research Group, English Students' Research Association, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Lukasz KarbowskiCardiology Research Group, English Students' Research Association, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz KłosiewiczDepartment of Medical Rescue, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0970-4664
Artur Baszko2nd Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6064-6458

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following an administered shock in cardiac arrest, the heart commonly experiences a short phase of inability to efficiently perfuse. Despite being a commonly used feature in the ICD population, postshock pacing (PSP) is yet to be adequately explored for its utility in this pulseless phase. Notably, an overwhelming proportion of available data for transcutaneous pacing in spontaneous cardiac arrest stem from the 1980s and 1990s and revolve largely around nonshockable, as opposed to shockable rhythms. The lack of large-scale clinical trials assessing the efficacy of transcutaneous PSP and the considerable advancements in technology and training facilities since the 1990s indicates a need for reevaluation of current understanding of PSP and its applicability in cardiac arrest. Shedding light into the possible implications of transcutaneous PSP in emergency setting cardiac arrest may not only reshape the current protocols of ALS but also carry the potential of improving survival rates. This concise review serves as a summary of the existing knowledge on the subject of PSP and reveals further possible directions for the development of this therapy.

Indexed as

advanced life supportcardiac arrestcardiopulmonary resuscitationpostshock pacing

Identifiers

PMID40951906
PMCPMC12431821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.