Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951852›Full record

ArticleJournal of mid-life health

Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology of Cutaneous Endometriosis: A Series of 17 Cases with Literature Review.

Deepika Chatterjee, Mona Agnihotri, Kanchan Kothari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deepika ChatterjeeDepartment of Pathology, Seth G. S. Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Mona AgnihotriDepartment of Pathology, Seth G. S. Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kanchan KothariDepartment of Pathology, Seth G. S. Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous endometriosis, a rare entity, is a type of extra pelvic endometriosis observed in 0.5%-1% of women. The most common sites include the abdominal wall, umbilicus, vulva, and extremities. It mostly occurs following gynecological surgery. Cutaneous endometriosis can mimic suture granuloma, hematoma, abscess, sarcoma, desmoid tumor, and metastasis due to variable presentations. Endometriosis shows a classic triad of epithelial cells, stromal cells, and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. The presence of any of the two features is diagnostic. We present 17 cases of cutaneous endometriosis diagnosed on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) over 12 years (January 2013-December 2024). Cytomorphological features were analyzed and correlated with clinico-radiological findings and histopathology, where available. Age ranged from 22 to 42 years (mean age 32 years). The abdominal wall was the commonest site with 15/17 (88%) cases and a history of prior surgery (cesarean section, laparotomy, and episiotomy) was present in 14/17 (82%) cases. The most common symptom was swelling and cyclic pain together, seen in 13/17 (77%) cases. Cytology revealed the presence of benign epithelial cells and macrophages/hemosiderophages in all 17 (100%) cases and endometrial stromal cells in 11/17 (65%) cases. Epithelial atypia was observed in 6/17 (35%) cases. Histopathology follow-up was available in 6/17 (35%) cases and all were concordant. FNAC is a useful modality in the early diagnosis of endometriosis and helps to rule out other lesions with high accuracy. Epithelial atypia is a potential pitfall and awareness of the clinical presentation is key to prevent overdiagnosis.

Indexed as

Cutaneousendometriosisfine needle aspiration cytologyscar

Identifiers

PMID40951852
PMCPMC12431710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.