Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951780›Full record

ArticleChemical science2025

Prediction of enzyme function using an interpretable optimized ensemble learning framework.

Saikat Dhibar, Sumon Basak, Biman Jana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saikat DhibarSchool of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Jadavpur Kolkata-700032 India pcbj@iacs.res.in.
Sumon BasakSchool of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Jadavpur Kolkata-700032 India pcbj@iacs.res.in.
Biman JanaSchool of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Jadavpur Kolkata-700032 India pcbj@iacs.res.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-1963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of enzyme function, particularly for newly discovered uncharacterized sequences, is immensely important for modern biological research. Recently, machine learning (ML) based methods have shown promise. However, such tools often suffer from complexity in feature extraction, interpretability, and generalization ability. In this study, we construct a dataset for enzyme functions and present an interpretable ML method, SOLVE (Soft-Voting Optimized Learning for Versatile Enzymes), that addresses these issues by using only combinations of tokenized subsequences from the protein's primary sequence for classification. SOLVE utilizes an ensemble learning framework integrating random forest (RF), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and decision tree (DT) models with an optimized weighted strategy, which enhances prediction accuracy, distinguishes enzymes from non-enzymes, and predicts enzyme commission (EC) numbers for mono- and multi-functional enzymes. The focal loss penalty in SOLVE effectively mitigates class imbalance, refining functional annotation accuracy. Additionally, SOLVE provides interpretability through Shapley analyses, identifying functional motifs at catalytic and allosteric sites of enzymes. By leveraging only primary sequence data, SOLVE streamlines high-throughput enzyme function prediction for functionally uncharacterized sequences and outperforms existing tools across all evaluation metrics on independent datasets. With its high prediction accuracy and ability to identify functional regions, SOLVE can become a promising tool in different fields of biology and therapeutic drug design.

Identifiers

PMID40951780
PMCPMC12424445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.