ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Cluster analysis as an effective tool for identifying physical fitness in students: the basis for an innovative approach to optimizing physical education in the university environment.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and sports genomics: advancing precision sports science and athletic performance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
- Group heterogeneity in the relationship between physical health level and psychological depression in college students.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study analyzes university students' physical fitness and, based on the results, applies cluster analysis to identify homogeneous groups with aim to optimize physical education programs at the university. Methods: A group of 88 first-year students underwent standardized UNIFITTES 6-60 focusing on strength (long jump from a place, sit-ups in 30 s, bent-arm hang test), endurance (20 m shuttle run test), speed (4 × 10 m shuttle run), flexibility (sit and reach test), and anthropometric measurements to determine BMI and WHR. Cluster analysis was used to identify homogeneous groups based on students' physical fitness and anthropometric profiles. Results: The average BMI reached the value of 23.95, with 12% of students falling into obesity. An increased risk of cardiovascular diseases were identified in 19% (WHR). The distance in standing long jump was 212.3 ± 29.2 cm, the number of sit-ups in 30 s was 228.2 ± 4.3 repetitions, the time in bent-arm hang test was 44.9 ± 30.6 s, the reaching distance in the sit and reach test was 4.2 ± 8.8 cm, the time of the 4 × 10 m shuttle run test was 10.4 ± 0.7 s, the distance covered in the 20 m shuttle run test was 45.4 ± 18.6 runs, and the right and left hand grip strength was 50.8 ± 9.6 kg and 49.1 ± 8.7 kg, respectively. Using cluster analysis and ANOVA, three significantly different performance groups were identified: cluster 0 ≼ cluster 1 ≼ cluster 2. Conclusion: These findings indicate that cluster analysis is an effective tool for distinguishing physical fitness levels in students. Identification of their performance profiles allows for the optimization of physical education programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.