Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951622›Full record

ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2025

#MissingInAction: A review of the social media footprint of South African interventional radiology practitioners.

Siviwe S Mpateni, Kuhle M Zwakala, Richard D Pitcher, Michelle Da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siviwe S MpateniDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6087-1244
Kuhle M ZwakalaDepartment of Marketing Management, Faculty of Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-5125
Richard D PitcherDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-0749
Michelle Da SilvaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-3622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interventional radiology (IR) is a rapidly developing branch of medicine; however, the general awareness of the subspeciality among patients and medical colleagues is limited. Social media (SM) has become an integral part of information transfer globally, and its utility as an effective communication tool can be leveraged by IRs to bridge this knowledge gap. This study investigated the SM footprint of IR providers in South Africa. Methods: An online analysis of radiology practices ( Results: There were 38 practices offering IR services with 68% ( Conclusion: Most South African IR practitioners have a SM presence with larger radiology practices establishing a broad digital presence on SM. Poor SM visibility, particularly from smaller practices, on these platforms may limit their ability to reach their target audience. Contribution: Improving the current usage of SM by IR practitioners may present an opportunity to display their services.

Indexed as

health promotioninterventional radiologymedical educationpublic healthsocial mediaSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40951622
PMCPMC12424034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.