Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951614›Full record

ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2025

Outcomes of hysterectomy for puerperal sepsis at an Academic Hospital: A retrospective study.

Esther Olusola, Admire Chikandiwa, Evelyn Ngwa Lumngwena, Poovangela Naidoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Esther OlusolaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7175-3958
Admire ChikandiwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4954-2225
Evelyn Ngwa LumngwenaSchool of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9302-8218
Poovangela NaidooDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1879-7137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy-related sepsis contributes significantly to maternal mortality. While there is substantial information on postpartum hysterectomy, information on outcomes of hysterectomy as source control for puerperal sepsis is limited. Knowledge of the common causative organisms and their antimicrobial sensitivity may assist with targeted antibiotic therapy to improve patient outcomes. This study described the indications and outcomes of surgery in patients following hysterectomy as source control for puerperal sepsis. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analysed the intra-operative and histological findings and the results of microbial culture and antibiotic sensitivity of women who underwent a hysterectomy for puerperal sepsis at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (CHBAH), Johannesburg, from January 2019 to December 2019. Results: Twenty-nine (88%) of the 33 women with hysterectomy for puerperal sepsis studied had a caesarean section (CS), 14 (48%) of whom had a CS performed for foetal distress. Eight of these 33 women (24%) had hypertensive-related disorders. The most common organisms cultured in the intra-abdominal fluid were Conclusion: Hysterectomy for puerperal sepsis was most frequently associated with CS, with hypertensive-related disorders the most common indication. Histological confirmation of sepsis is required, as the histological findings differed by 15% with surgical diagnosis. Contribution:

Indexed as

antibiotic resistancebacterial strainshysterectomypostpartumpuerperal sepsis

Identifiers

PMID40951614
PMCPMC12424038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.