ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2025
Optimising registrar research supervision: Quality, conflict management and best practices.
Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Completing a Master of Medicine (MMed) research assignment involves both financial and time commitments. In addition, it requires considerable collaboration among supervisors, registrars, research coordinators, assistants, nurses, and patients. Substantial professional effort is necessary for developing the research concept, reviewing relevant literature, formulating a research question, and designing an appropriate methodology. From this perspective, we reflect on a clinical research supervision workshop that focuses on establishing robust supervision and conflict management practices. The workshop aimed to enhance supervision capacity for MMed research, guiding students in scientific rigour and methodology. By addressing this need, we hope to improve research quality across South African faculties and develop a new generation of skilled clinician-researchers. Clinicians as supervisors, play a pivotal role in guiding students through their academic and professional journeys. Best practices include fostering open communication, setting clear expectations, and providing consistent feedback. Institutional support is crucial, offering resources and training to enhance supervisory skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.