Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951587›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Sensory Acceptance and Physicochemical Properties of Beef Meatballs Fortified With Apple (

Peter Gracey, Olga I Padilla-Zakour, Elad Tako

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter GraceyDepartment of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6566-5755
Olga I Padilla-ZakourDepartment of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.
Elad TakoDepartment of Food Science Cornell University Ithaca New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7856-5197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApple pomace (AP), a byproduct of apple processing, generates over 4 million tons of global waste annually. Its high moisture content and organic load pose environmental concerns, while disposal imposes financial costs. However, AP is rich in dietary fiber, antioxidants, and micronutrients, offering potential as a functional ingredient to enhance the nutritional quality of food products. This study evaluated the feasibility of incorporating freeze-dried AP into beef meatballs at two levels (10% and 20%

methodsPomace from three apple varieties-Cortland, Empire, and Red Delicious-was freeze-dried for 24 h and analyzed for polyphenol and fiber content. The rehydrated pomace was then added to 80% lean beef at 10% and 20% inclusion rates. Meatballs were evaluated for texture, color, and proximate composition. A sensory panel of 104 untrained consumers assessed aroma, texture, taste, and overall preference. Data were analyzed using Friedman's two-way analysis.

resultsNo significant differences ( SIGNIFICANCE: Results support the feasibility of incorporating up to 20% apple pomace into meat products without compromising sensory acceptability. AP offers a high-fiber, sustainable ingredient option for value-added meat applications. Future studies should explore broader applications and potential health benefits.

Indexed as

apple pomacefiberpolyphenolsprocessed meatsensory analysis

Identifiers

PMID40951587
PMCPMC12431853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.