SynthesisNarra J2025
Associations between plasma beta amyloid and cognitive decline: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is a leading neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive decline. Early prediction is crucial for enabling timely interventions. Plasma amyloid β-peptides (Aβ), particularly the Aβ-42/Aβ-40 ratio, have been proposed as potential non-invasive biomarkers for cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease risk. However, conflicting findings and methodological variability have hindered consensus regarding their clinical utility. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the plasma Aβ levels predict dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cognitive decline. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they measured at least one plasma Aβ species (Aβ-40, Aβ-42, or the Aβ-42/Aβ-40 ratio) and reported outcomes related to dementia, Alzheimer's disease, or cognitive change. Only human studies published in peer-reviewed journals were included. A comprehensive search of six databases (PubMed, PMC, SSRN, Scopus, BioRxiv, and MedRxiv) was conducted up to December 1, 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool, and pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects meta-analysis. A total of 25 studies were included in the systematic review, with four contributing to the meta-analysis. Lower plasma Aβ-42/Aβ-40 ratio was not significantly associated with Alzheimer's disease risk (pooled HR=0.8; 95%CI: 0.62-1.04), and substantial heterogeneity was observed (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.