ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2025
The formation of palliative treatment intentions among patients with advanced gynecological cancer in China: A grounded theory study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the mechanisms underlying decision-making for palliative treatment in patients with advanced gynecological cancer, focusing on their subjective experiences and the interplay of emotional, cognitive, social, and cultural factors that shape these decisions, thereby complementing existing research on the role of palliative care. Methods: Between April and October 2023, 14 inpatients with advanced cervical, ovarian, or endometrial cancer at a tertiary hospital in Guangdong underwent in-depth, semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory approach, which involved open, axial, and selective coding to ensure theoretical saturation. Results: Three core categories were identified: decision intention (influenced by family support, trust in providers, and disease cognition); decision conditions (including physical status, economic burden, quality-of-life goals, and cultural perceptions); and decision outcomes (which varied with prognostic expectations, prioritization of family interests, reflecting Chinese collectivism). Conclusions: Palliative decision-making is complex and culturally embedded. The findings emphasize the necessity for patient-centered communication, sensitivity to sociocultural subtleties, and customized decision-support systems to facilitate informed choices and enhance the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.