ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Knowledge gaps about the diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism: an international patient survey.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over-diagnosis and over-treatment of hypothyroidism is a growing concern. The role of patient knowledge has not been previously investigated. The aim was to explore patient knowledge in relation to diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism. Methods: Cross-sectional, international online survey. Participants were people with treated hypothyroidism amounting to 3421 valid respondents from 68 countries. A questionnaire was used, which included knowledge statements about hypothyroidism relating to recommendations by international guidelines. The principal knowledge statement was "A patient with a normal thyroid blood test does not need to be treated with thyroid hormones (even if they have positive thyroid antibodies and symptoms)", and participants were asked to classify it as "false", "true", or "don't know". Responses were divided into corresponding groups: "Incorrect", "Correct", and "Unsure". Associations of groups with respondent characteristics and patient reported outcomes were investigated. Responses to a further seven knowledge statements explored ampliative knowledge about hypothyroidism. Results: With regards to the principal knowledge statement, "Correct", "Incorrect" and "Unsure" comprised 15.3%, 50.7% and 34.0% of responses to the respectively. "Incorrect" respondents were more likely than expected to live in the United Kingdom, have Hashimoto's thyroiditis, have a recent low self-reported serum thyrotropin, be treated with liothyronine-containing medication, and use social media and the internet for hypothyroidism-related information daily. "Incorrect" responses were associated with dissatisfaction, poor perceived control of symptoms and negative impact of hypothyroidism on everyday activities. The proportion of "Incorrect" responses for seven other knowledge statements ranged between 1.8-34.9%. Discussion: Incorrect responses to the principal knowledge statement were common in this sample of people with hypothyroidism, and associated with several demographic variables and adverse patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that knowledge gaps about the significance of symptoms in relation to the diagnosis and treatment of hypothyroidism may be important in driving over-diagnosis and over-treatment. The high number of "Unsure" respondents suggests that patient education may be an effective intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.