Trial reportFrontiers in public health2025
The effects of an 8-week functional training program on functional movement and physical fitness in male university students: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of progressive-versus constant-intensity high-intensity functional training on health-related physical fitness in untrained female university students: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
- Tailored Therapeutic Strategies for Fetuses, Neonates, Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Athletes, and Critical Cases in the Era of Personalized Medicine.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The physical fitness and functional movement capabilities of university students are fundamental to their long-term health, yet traditional physical education models may have limitations in concurrently enhancing both aspects. This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week functional training (FT) program versus a traditional training (TT) program on functional movement quality and comprehensive physical fitness in non-athlete male university students. Methods: This study was a randomized controlled trial. Thirty-five healthy male university students (mean age 18.8 ± 0.9 years) were randomly assigned to either a functional training group (FT group; Results: Significant time × group interaction effects were observed for most outcome measures. Compared to the TT group, the FT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in the total FMS score and several components, particularly those assessing dynamic stability and core control (e.g., Active Straight-Leg Raise, Rotary Stability; Conclusion: For male university students, an 8-week functional training program is more effective than a traditional training regimen for concurrently improving functional movement patterns and comprehensive physical fitness. These findings support the integration of functional training principles and methods into university physical education curricula to more effectively enhance students' overall physical preparedness and movement quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.