ArticleJournal of chemical education2025
Development of a Safe, Scalable, Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience for Analytical Chemistry: The μCURE Project.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pick Your Own Adventure: Orthogonal Methods for Analyzing Polyphenols.Journal of chemical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) can have many positive effects on students' learning and sense of self-efficacy. We have developed a networked CURE between four different institutions designed for courses in analytical chemistry that focuses on the process of adapting published solution-phase colorimetric assays into microfluidic paper analytical devices (μPAD) assays. We used a backward design process to develop 5 scaffolded learning outcomes: (1) identify and assess relevant literature sources, (2) propose a viable experimental plan to answer a well-defined scientific question based on literature information and experimental results, (3) apply appropriate methods of data analysis to interpret experimental results, (4) evaluate multiple pieces of experimental data to support conclusions, and (5) contribute to a team by working collaboratively toward common goals. Students begin the project by completing a literature search assignment to identify a published colorimetric assay they plan to adapt. They then write a proposal which identifies their analyte, sample of interest, and the figures of merit required for successful sample analysis using their μPAD. During the 3-5 weeks of laboratory work, students conduct their experiments, and each week evaluate the significance of their data and propose an experimental plan for the upcoming week. At the end of the μCURE project, students present their results in a joint, asynchronous poster session. Student artifacts are assessed for evidence of particular skills using rubrics from the Enhancing Learning by Improving Process Skills in STEM (ELIPSS) Project. Scores on the rubrics indicate partial to full attainment of each of the five learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.