ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Multi-omics modality completion and knowledge distillation for drug response prediction in cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, the development of personalized treatment strategies for cervical cancer is hindered by the limited accuracy of drug response prediction, partly due to missing modalities in multi-omics data. We present MKDR, a deep learning framework that integrates variational autoencoder-based modality completion with knowledge distillation to transfer information from complete omics data to incomplete samples. MKDR-Student achieves state-of-the-art performance On cervical cancer cell lines, with an MSE of 0.0034 (34% lower than Xgboost), R² of 0.8126, and MAE of 0.0431, while maintaining high Spearman (0.8647) and Pearson (0.9033) correlations. Data ablation experiments highlight the contributions of knowledge distillation and modality completion: removing the teacher increases MSE by 23%, and VAE reduces error by 15% with 40% missingness. Interpretability analysis shows balanced feature contributions from gene expression (38%), copy number variation (30%), and mutation data (32%), indicating effective multi-omics learning and integration by the student model. Under limited-input conditions, MKDR's accuracy drops less than 5%, supporting its robustness and potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.