ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Comparative analysis of multimodal architectures for effective skin lesion detection using clinical and image data.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective applications of artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia: a scoping review.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Introduction: Skin lesion classification poses a critical diagnostic challenge in dermatology, where early and accurate identification has a direct impact on patient outcomes. While deep learning approaches have shown promise using dermatoscopic images alone, the integration of clinical metadata remains underexplored despite its potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Methods: We developed a novel multimodal data fusion framework that systematically integrates dermatoscopic images with clinical metadata for the classification of skin lesions. Using the HAM10000 dataset, we evaluated multiple fusion strategies, including simple concatenation, weighted concatenation, self-attention mechanisms, and cross-attention fusion. Clinical features were processed through a customized Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), while images were analyzed using a modified Residual Networks (ResNet) architecture. Model interpretability was enhanced using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) visualization to identify the contribution of clinical attributes to classification decisions. Results: Cross-attention fusion achieved the highest classification accuracy, demonstrating superior performance compared to unimodal approaches and simpler fusion techniques. The multimodal framework significantly outperformed image-only baselines, with cross-attention effectively capturing inter-modal dependencies and contextual relationships between visual and clinical data modalities. Discussion/Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that integrating clinical metadata with dermatoscopic images substantially improves the accuracy of skin lesion classification. However, challenges, including class imbalance and the computational complexity of advanced fusion methods, require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.