ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2025
Analysis of racial differences in HER2 status and molecular subtype in grade 3 endometroid endometrial carcinoma.
Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To characterize stage I-III Grade 3 endometroid endometrial cancer (Gr3 EEC) by molecular subtype and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and explore differences in characteristics by race. Methods: We identified patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III Gr3 EEC from a single-institution health system cancer registry and pathologically confirmed the diagnosis. Review of the electronic health record was performed as needed to confirm patient characteristics. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for HER2 was performed on all primary tumors. Results: Thirty-four primary cases remained classified as stage I-III Gr3 EEC after pathologic review and exclusion of cases lacking in-house primary tumor for re-review. Fifteen were categorized as microsatellite unstable (MSI; 44 %), 10 as copy number high (CNH; 29 %), six as polymerase E mutant ( Conclusion: In stage I-III stage Gr3 EEC HER2 positivity (3 + ) was uncommon, but expression at the 2 + level was frequent, and did not differ by race. In this limited sample, there were no differences in distribution of TCGA subtype amongst patients with grade 3 EEC. Other causes should be explored to explain reported differences in outcomes in EEC by race.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.