Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951321›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2025

Personalised and Collaborative Learning Experience (PCLE) Framework for AI-driven Learning Management System (LMS).

Claireta Tang Weiling, Lew Sook Ling, Ooi Shih Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claireta Tang WeilingFaculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Bukit Beruang, Melaka, 75450, Malaysia.
Lew Sook LingCentre for Advanced Analytics, CoE for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Bukit Beruang, Melaka, 75450, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4515-1163
Ooi Shih YinCentre for Advanced Analytics, CoE for Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Bukit Beruang, Melaka, 75450, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3024-1011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding student engagement and academic performance is crucial in AI-driven e-learning environments. Many learning management systems (LMS) lack effective collaborative course recommendation strategies, limiting support for personalised learning experiences. Methods: This study developed and evaluated collaborative filtering and machine learning models to generate course recommendations. Machine learning models such as K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), and Neural Collaborative Filtering (NCF) were applied. Two education-related datasets from Kaggle were used. The first contains 100,000 course reviews from Coursera, and the second dataset includes 209,000 course details and comments from Udemy. Data preprocessing was conducted to clean and structure both datasets. The model effectiveness was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Hit Rate (HR), and Average Reciprocal Hit Ranking (ARHR). Results: K-Nearest Neighbours showed the highest performance on the Coursera dataset, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering maintained stable predictive accuracy across both datasets. The findings indicate that dataset characteristics influenced model performance. K-Nearest Neighbours worked effectively with structured and consistent data, while Singular Value Decomposition and Neural Collaborative Filtering produced consistent outcomes across diverse datasets. Conclusions: This study contributes to e-learning research by demonstrating the potential of collaborative filtering and machine learning in enhancing course recommendations and promoting engagement in the learning management system. Limitations include the use of two datasets and a limited set of machine learning models. Future work aims to integrate learning styles and evaluate the framework across more diverse educational contexts to support adaptive and collaborative learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLearningMachine LearningCooperative BehaviorHumansCollaborative FilteringK-Nearest Neighbours Model (KNN)Learning Management SystemNeural Collaborative Filtering Model (NCF)Personalised LearningSingular Value Decomposition Model (SVD)

Identifiers

PMID40951321
PMCPMC12432497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.