Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951306›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Analysis of the microbiota of pregnant women in relation to weight gain during pregnancy - a pilot study.

Katarzyna Kosinska-Kaczynska, Magdalena Zgliczynska, Dominika Krawczyk, Magdalena Piatkowska, Aneta Balabas, Paweł Czarnowski, Krzysztof Goryca, Piotr Glinicki, Jerzy Ostrowski, Natalia Zeber-Lubecka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katarzyna Kosinska-KaczynskaDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena ZgliczynskaDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Dominika KrawczykDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena PiatkowskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Aneta BalabasDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł CzarnowskiDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof GorycaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr GlinickiDepartment of Endocrinology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Jerzy OstrowskiDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia Zeber-LubeckaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Excessive body weight was associated with changes in individual microbiota. However, limited research on the impact of excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) revealed that microbiota patterns related to GWG differed from those linked to pregestational overweight or obesity. Aim: The aim was to compare differences in the microbiota of women in the third trimester of gestation who had excessive and non-excessive weight gain during pregnancy. Material and methods: Women with a singleton gestation at 34 + 0 weeks and normal pregestational body mass index were recruited to the study. Patients who were diagnosed with excessive weight gain formed the study group (n=11), while those with non-excessive weight gain formed the control group (n=10). Results: In cervico-vaginal samples, bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing demonstrated a decrease in alpha diversity, measured with the Shannon index, in the study group compared to the control group. While the difference was not statistically significant after correction for multiple testing, the Chao index showed a persistent trend toward reduced species richness in the study group. In stool samples, we identified 29 genera with differential representation between the groups, including nine overrepresented and ten underrepresented genera. The cervico-vaginal microbiota analysis detected 12 species distinguishing the study group from the controls, with four genera ( Conclusions: Despite small sample size, we demonstrated slight trends in microbiota composition between groups. These suggest potential differences in microbial diversity and composition associated with excessive GWG, which supports further investigation.

Indexed as

BacteriaGestational Weight GainMicrobiotaWeight GainAdultBiodiversityBody Mass IndexDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFecesFemaleHumansObesityOverweightPilot ProjectsPregnancyDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sexcessive gestational weight gaingestational weight gainmicrobiomemicrobiotapregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40951306
PMCPMC12426079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.