ArticleResearch square2025
Insights from the development of an online toolkit to promote community engaged substance use research in the Southwest Borderlands Region.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Exploring Health Beliefs for Community Engagement and Diversity in Clinical Trials (EXPLORE) Toolkit is an online resource designed to support researchers and frontline workers addressing substance use in the Borderlands region of the Southwestern United States. Developed by an interdisciplinary team from the University of New Mexico and New Mexico State University, the toolkit aims to enhance engagement of underrepresented communities in substance use clinical trials through culturally sensitive, community-centered research practices. This paper presents the design, creation, and testing of the toolkit through multiple phases from initial design to final evaluation. Quantitative findings showed strong endorsement of the toolkit, with 79% of participants rating it "Very important" for promoting culturally competent research. Domain-specific ratings averaged 4.48-4.61 on a 5-point scale, with highest ratings for "Building on Community Strengths" (4.61). Post-testing showed improved attitudes toward clinical research participation (pre: 7.19, post: 7.94 on a 10-point scale) and enhanced understanding of research terminology (pre: 7.97, post: 8.74). Qualitative findings revealed critical themes including the importance of cultural appropriateness, community gatekeepers' roles, and confidentiality concerns, particularly in rural and border communities. The EXPLORE Toolkit demonstrates promise for bridging research-community gaps while highlighting the value of interdisciplinary, community-centered approaches. Results suggest its potential for enhancing diverse community participation in clinical trials while emphasizing the need for ongoing adaptation to specific community contexts. The toolkit is available at the following link: https://sites.google.com/view/exploretoolkitcopy/home?authuser=0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.