Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951259›Full record

ArticleSurgical oncology insight2025

Trends in surgical treatment of stage IV melanoma: A SEER database study.

Orly N Farber, Yu-Jen Chen, George Molina, Olivia Monton, Elizabeth J Lilley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical oncology insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence in melanoma research: a bibliometric analysis".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Orly N FarberDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Yu-Jen ChenCenter for Surgery and Public Health at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
George MolinaDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Olivia MontonDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elizabeth J LilleyDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN ALIMENTARY TRACT SURGERYT32DK007754 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HODIN, RICHARD A. · 1997 to 2025
$6.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immunotherapy for advanced melanoma has improved survival outcomes and changed the surgical management of this disease. Prior work demonstrated no difference in rates of resection for stage IV melanoma after the introduction of immunotherapy. However, prior data were limited by shorter study durations and by only examining distant resections. As such, we sought to expand this work by examining longitudinal trends in both primary and distant resections for patients with advanced melanoma in the years after immunotherapy approvals. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to capture adult patients diagnosed with stage IV cutaneous melanoma between 2004 and 2020. We identified the annual percentage of patients who underwent surgical resections. Results: Of the 10,632 case records included, significantly fewer patients underwent surgical resection in the post-immunotherapy era (2011-2020) as compared to the pre-immunotherapy era (2004-2013) (50.4 % vs. 59.6 %, p < 0.0001). In our interrupted time series, we found a significant decline in the rate of all surgical resections in the post-immunotherapy era, decreasing by 0.97 % per year (p < 0.0001). There were significant decreases in the rates of both primary and distant resections in the post-immunotherapy era. For primary resections alone, we observed a significant level of change with annual rates of surgery declining by 5.1 % (p = 0.014) after 2011. Conclusions: This study confirms that a significant - albeit declining - proportion of patients with stage IV melanoma undergo both primary and distant resections in the post-immunotherapy era. Synopsis: Since the initial approval of immunotherapy to treat advanced melanoma in 2011, the role of surgical care for melanoma has evolved. This study examined trends in the utilization of surgery for patients with stage IV melanoma before and after 2011. We identified patients diagnosed with stage IV melanoma between 2004 and 2020 (N = 10,632) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Using an interrupted time series analysis, we compared the proportion of patients who underwent either primary or distant surgical resections in the pre- and post-immunotherapy eras (59.6 % vs. 50.4 %, respectively; p < 0.0001). There was a significant decline in the rate of all surgical resections in the post-immunotherapy era, decreasing by 0.97 % per year (p < 0.0001). These results highlight diminishing but still robust surgical treatment of stage IV melanoma since the introduction of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyInterrupted time seriesMelanomaMetastaticSEER

Identifiers

PMID40951259
PMCPMC12431681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.