ArticleCureus2025
Design and Development of a Machine Learning Model for Predicting ICU Patients' Length of Stay.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Predicting the Length of Stay (LOS) for patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) can aid in improving care management and resource allocation. Compared to traditional scoring systems, machine learning methods usually provide more accurate LOS predictions, highlighting the need for improved precision. This study aims to introduce and assess the stacked ensemble machine learning model capabilities to predict ICU LOS for both short- and long-term patient groups, using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV-derived features. Methods We used approximately 148,000 patient records from the eICU Collaborative Research Database. To predict patient LOS, we first divided the patients into two groups (short- and long-term), based on their actual ICU LOS. Subsequently, we developed two stacked ensemble learning models for each patient group. Results For short-term patients, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 1.037, whereas for long-term patients it was 1.997. Particularly, for patients with long-term actual ICU LOS (median 10.6 days), the respective predictions were clinically acceptable, suggesting the model's dynamics in real ICU environment applications. The clinical utility of these predictions can help clinicians in managing patient care in the ICU. Validation of these findings on external datasets may increase the applicability in daily clinical practice. Limitations include the use of data only from United States ICUs, selection of input features, and lack of external validation, which may affect the further generalizability and applicability of our model to different clinical settings. Conclusion The clinical utility of these predictions can help clinicians in managing patient care in the ICU. Future validation of these findings on external datasets may increase the applicability in daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.