Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951245›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Effectiveness of Nursing Documentation Frameworks (SBAR, SOAP, and PIE) in Enhancing Clinical Handoffs and Patient Safety.

Esthela Carolina Hidalgo Tapia, Joanna León Yosa, María Humbelina Olalla García, Nube Janeth Clavijo Morocho, Yesenia Alexandra Sanmartín Calle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Esthela Carolina Hidalgo TapiaNursing Education, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, ECU.
Joanna León YosaNursing Education, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, ECU.
María Humbelina Olalla GarcíaNursing Education, Universidad Estatal de Bolivar, Guaranda, ECU.
Nube Janeth Clavijo MorochoNursing Education, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, ECU.
Yesenia Alexandra Sanmartín CalleNursing Education, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, ECU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constructed communication models, including SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan), and PIE (Problem, Intervention, Evaluation), have become more and more significant in the field of nursing because of improving handoff communication and ensuring patient safety. The purposes of these documentation formats are to achieve consistency in sharing information, keep to a minimum the occurrence of errors, and enhance the concreteness and effectiveness of communication between healthcare professionals. The systematic review was conducted to determine how the SBAR, SOAP, and PIE models can help to enhance the quality of the handoff process, alleviating the number of clinical errors and ensuring the safety of patients in different clinical contexts. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using a combination of text words and controlled vocabulary. Studies published in English between January 2005 and May 2025, involving registered nurses and nursing staff in hospital or inpatient settings, were included. Only quasi-experimental studies, randomized controlled trials, and mixed-method studies were considered. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 for randomized controlled trials and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized studies, and the methodological quality of mixed-method studies was appraised with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Risk of bias figures were visualized using the robvis tool. A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the 15 included studies ranged from moderate to high. Findings demonstrated that structured documentation frameworks significantly improve communication clarity, reduce information omissions, enhance documentation accuracy, and lower the incidence of handoff-related errors. SBAR was particularly effective in high-acuity settings, while SOAP and PIE were beneficial in routine care and ongoing patient assessment. Overall, the implementation of structured nursing documentation enhances interdisciplinary collaboration, supports safer transitions of care, and contributes to improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

clinical handoffsnursing documentationpatient safetypiesbarsoapstructured communication

Identifiers

PMID40951245
PMCPMC12431931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.