Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951208›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Efficacy and Safety of Non-cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Injections for Facial Skin Biorevitalization: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Uncontrolled, Post-marketing Study.

Stefano Chahine, Barbara Marozzi, Alessandro Valle, Laura Michellini, Tiziana Lazzari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07010549 (Clinical and Instrumental Evaluation of the Face Biorevitalization Effect With the Medical Device Foliage Hydrofil), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07010549 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical and Instrumental Evaluation of the Face Biorevitalization Effect With the Medical Device Foliage Hydrofil

TypeinterventionalSponsorPhitogen Beauty Labs SRLRan2022 to 2023Enrolled24ConditionsSkin AgeingArmsHyaluronic Acid injections
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefano ChahinePharmacy, Phitogen Beauty Labs SpA, San Benedetto del Tronto, ITA.
Barbara MarozziDermatology, CDS (Casa della Salute) SpA, Genova, ITA.
Alessandro ValleDermatology, CDS (Casa della Salute) SpA, Genova, ITA.
Laura MichelliniPharmacology, Latis CRO Srl, Genova, ITA.
Tiziana LazzariDermatology, CDS (Casa della Salute) SpA, Genova, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiorevitalization is a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure that involves the targeted intradermal injection of bioactive substances designed to enrich the skin and stimulate its natural regenerative capabilities. The aim of this single-center, open-label, single-arm, uncontrolled, post-marketing study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of biostimulatory injections using a proprietary, sterile gel containing non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Foliage Hydrofil

methodsThe trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07010549). The intended target population comprised adults with mild-to-moderate facial photoaging and Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV, without active inflammatory dermatoses or recent aesthetic interventions. Twenty-four Caucasian subjects (21 women, three men; mean age: 44 ± 7.1 years) received three intradermal injections of the study product at three-week intervals. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in skin capacitance, an objective measure of hydration, assessed via corneometry. Secondary endpoints included investigator and subject assessments of aesthetic improvement, while safety was evaluated through continuous adverse event monitoring.

resultsThe mean skin capacitance was 23.1 arbitrary units (a.u.) at baseline and increased to 33.2 a.u. at the end of the study, indicating a significant improvement in skin hydration (p < 0.05). Secondary outcomes showed moderate improvements in skin texture and tone, and high levels of participant satisfaction with the treatment. No adverse events were reported.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the tested non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel safely improves skin hydration and patient satisfaction in facial biorevitalization. Although promising, these findings are constrained by the study's uncontrolled, small-scale design; therefore, larger randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these outcomes and evaluate their long-term durability.

Indexed as

aesthetic improvementbiorevitalizationfacehyaluronic acidskin capacitance

Identifiers

PMID40951208
PMCPMC12431166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.