Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951180›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Quality of Life Among Breast Cancer Survivors Treated With Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BR42 Questionnaire.

Revathy Nair Es, Hemanth S Ghalige, Vinaya Gopalaswamy, Arunkumar Tukaram, Shwetha Subbaramaiah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Revathy Nair EsSurgery, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, IND.
Hemanth S GhaligeSurgery, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, IND.
Vinaya GopalaswamyInternal Medicine, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, IND.
Arunkumar TukaramSurgery, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, IND.
Shwetha SubbaramaiahMedical Oncology, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction In India, breast cancer is often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to a high proportion of patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM) as the primary surgical treatment. While effective, MRM is associated with significant long-term physical and psychosocial morbidity. This study aimed to assess the quality of life (QoL) of breast cancer survivors treated with MRM in a tertiary care center, utilizing the updated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-BR42 questionnaire. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at the Employees' State Insurance Corporation Medical College (ESIC MC) and Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (PGIMSR), Bengaluru, from September 2024 to June 2025. A consecutive sample of 300 female breast cancer survivors who had undergone MRM and completed adjuvant therapy was recruited. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews using EORTC QLQ-BR42 modules. QoL scores were calculated and transformed to a 0-100 scale. Group comparisons were performed using independent t-tests and ANOVA to assess differences in QoL between patients who received single modality (adjuvant chemotherapy alone) and those who received dual modality (adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy). Results A total of 300 participants were included, with a mean age of 52.4 ± 10.6 years. All had undergone MRM, with 66% (n = 198) receiving dual modality and 34% (n = 102) receiving single modality treatment. The study found high mean linearized scores for body image satisfaction (79.77 ± 8.99) and breast satisfaction (70.00 ± 8.50). However, the future perspective domain was moderately affected (62.00 ± 15.00). Symptom domains showed that breast symptoms (55.68 ± 24.90) and arm symptoms (24.77 ± 10.20) had the highest symptom burden. Sexual health was the most severely impaired aspect, with a mean score of 1.67 for sexual functioning and 0.00 for sexual enjoyment. No statistically significant differences in any QoL domain were observed between the single modality and dual modality treatment groups. Conclusions Our study suggests that breast cancer survivors treated with MRM in this cohort report a high degree of satisfaction with their body image but suffer from significant physical symptoms and severely impaired sexual health. The addition of radiotherapy does not appear to significantly impact long-term QoL. The study underscores the need for comprehensive, culturally sensitive, and resource-appropriate supportive care, particularly focusing on sexual health and symptom management, to improve the holistic well-being of these survivors.

Indexed as

carcinoma of breasteortc qlq-br42modified radical mastectomy (mrm)quality of life (qol)survivorship needs

Identifiers

PMID40951180
PMCPMC12429716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.