ArticleCureus2025
Seroprevalence of Brucellosis Among Veterinary Health Personnel in Ernakulam District: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrucellosis is a zoonotic disease with significant economic and public health implications. Infections in humans are always transmitted through direct or indirect contact with infected animals or their products. A substantial proportion of the Indian population is occupationally exposed to animals, increasing the risk of zoonotic infections such as brucellosis.
objectiveTo determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis among veterinary health personnel in Ernakulam district and to analyze the profile of brucellosis cases reported at a tertiary care center over five years.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 315 veterinary health personnel from government and private sectors in Ernakulam district, selected through universal sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, and blood samples were tested for Brucella IgG using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Additionally, a secondary data analysis was done for brucellosis cases reported at a tertiary care center from 2014 to 2019.
resultsSeroprevalence of brucellosis among 315 veterinary health personnel in Ernakulam district was two (0.63%; 95% CI: 0.1-2.3). Among 828 patients presenting with brucellosis-like symptoms at a tertiary care center over five years, 56 (6.76%; 95% CI: 5.06-8.46) were diagnosed with the disease.
conclusionGaps in surveillance, reporting, and screening limit effective control of brucellosis. Enhancing screening of both cattle and humans, along with improving public awareness, food safety, and occupational hygiene, is essential to prevent human infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.