ReviewCureus2025
Therapeutic Vasopressor Use for Postspinal Hypotension in Low-Risk Elective Cesarean Deliveries: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agreement and trending ability between non-invasive and invasive hemodynamic monitoring during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Prevention of post-spinal hypotension in high risk cesarean delivery: A systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of prophylactic vasopressor infusions.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of the HUAWEI WATCH D for measuring spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: a diagnostic test.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) is a common complication of cesarean delivery (CD), potentially leading to maternal discomfort and fetal compromise. Vasopressors such as norepinephrine (NE), phenylephrine (PE), and ephedrine (EP) are frequently used for treatment, yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of NE, PE, and EP for managing postspinal hypotension (PSH) in low-risk elective CD. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2025. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420251074831). We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving parturients undergoing low-risk elective cesarean section who received NE, PE, or EP for the management of PSH. A systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA), and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed. The primary outcome was the successful correction of PSH. Secondary outcomes included maternal bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, neonatal Apgar scores, and umbilical artery pH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was graded with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. A total of 16 RCTs encompassing 2,102 parturients were included. NE demonstrated superior efficacy in reversing PSH (odds ratio (OR): 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.58) and was associated with fewer adverse maternal events, including bradycardia (OR: 0.28) and nausea/vomiting (OR: 0.36), compared to PE and EP. Neonatal outcomes were generally comparable across groups, though NE showed a favorable trend in reducing the risk of neonatal acidosis (umbilical artery pH OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06-1.54). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings and TSA supported the robustness of these findings. NE appears to be the most effective and best-tolerated vasopressor for treating SAIH during elective CD, without compromising neonatal safety. These results support the preferential use of NE over PE and EP in this clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.