Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40951165›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Therapeutic Vasopressor Use for Postspinal Hypotension in Low-Risk Elective Cesarean Deliveries: A Systematic Review, Network Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.

Arya Babul, Sohi Ashraf, Leanne Free, Jyoti Desai, Momina Hussain, Najib Babul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arya BabulBiomedical Sciences, West Career & Technical Academy, Las Vegas, USA.
Sohi AshrafIntensive Care, MountainView Hospital, Las Vegas, USA.
Leanne FreeGynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Jyoti DesaiGynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV), Las Vegas, USA.
Momina HussainGenomics, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, CHN.
Najib BabulDrug Development, Quadra Therapeutics, Las Vegas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) is a common complication of cesarean delivery (CD), potentially leading to maternal discomfort and fetal compromise. Vasopressors such as norepinephrine (NE), phenylephrine (PE), and ephedrine (EP) are frequently used for treatment, yet their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of NE, PE, and EP for managing postspinal hypotension (PSH) in low-risk elective CD. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov through June 2025. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420251074831). We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving parturients undergoing low-risk elective cesarean section who received NE, PE, or EP for the management of PSH. A systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA), and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed. The primary outcome was the successful correction of PSH. Secondary outcomes included maternal bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, neonatal Apgar scores, and umbilical artery pH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and the certainty of evidence was graded with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. A total of 16 RCTs encompassing 2,102 parturients were included. NE demonstrated superior efficacy in reversing PSH (odds ratio (OR): 0.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.58) and was associated with fewer adverse maternal events, including bradycardia (OR: 0.28) and nausea/vomiting (OR: 0.36), compared to PE and EP. Neonatal outcomes were generally comparable across groups, though NE showed a favorable trend in reducing the risk of neonatal acidosis (umbilical artery pH OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.06-1.54). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) rankings and TSA supported the robustness of these findings. NE appears to be the most effective and best-tolerated vasopressor for treating SAIH during elective CD, without compromising neonatal safety. These results support the preferential use of NE over PE and EP in this clinical setting.

Indexed as

low-risk elective cesarean deliverynetwork meta-analysisnorepinephrinespinal anesthesiavasopressors

Identifiers

PMID40951165
PMCPMC12431973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.